<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;&#8230; so we went ahead and pieced together a new girl.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.about-face.org/so-we-went-ahead-and-pieced-together-a-new-girl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.about-face.org/so-we-went-ahead-and-pieced-together-a-new-girl/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gin</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/so-we-went-ahead-and-pieced-together-a-new-girl/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Gin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about-face.org/blog/?p=355#comment-451</guid>
		<description>I think Danielle is right... no matter how much information is available about photo retouching, the image itself is still more powerful.  I am a grown woman and I feel happy and secure with my life, my body, and who I am.  I know that the photos are retouched.  (I know, I know, I know.)  And yet, I still take a bit of a self-esteem hit when I see those pictures of women with smooth, toned thighs or beautiful poreless skin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Danielle is right&#8230; no matter how much information is available about photo retouching, the image itself is still more powerful.  I am a grown woman and I feel happy and secure with my life, my body, and who I am.  I know that the photos are retouched.  (I know, I know, I know.)  And yet, I still take a bit of a self-esteem hit when I see those pictures of women with smooth, toned thighs or beautiful poreless skin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariah Fine</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/so-we-went-ahead-and-pieced-together-a-new-girl/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariah Fine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 03:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about-face.org/blog/?p=355#comment-450</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/so-we-went-ahead-and-pieced-together-a-new-girl/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about-face.org/blog/?p=355#comment-449</guid>
		<description>I loved it when Cindy Crawford said that. I think it was on the Tyra Banks show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved it when Cindy Crawford said that. I think it was on the Tyra Banks show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ovk</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/so-we-went-ahead-and-pieced-together-a-new-girl/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>ovk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about-face.org/blog/?p=355#comment-448</guid>
		<description>model&#039;s themselves end up not resembling themselves, a paraphrase, of what the narrator said is so on the dot.

even cindy crawford once said, &quot;after hours in the make-up chair i don&#039;t even look like cindy crawford&quot;...
some of the most noteably beautiful women don&#039;t even look what the magazines and advertisments make them to be.

picaso, anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>model&#8217;s themselves end up not resembling themselves, a paraphrase, of what the narrator said is so on the dot.</p>
<p>even cindy crawford once said, &#8220;after hours in the make-up chair i don&#8217;t even look like cindy crawford&#8221;&#8230;<br />
some of the most noteably beautiful women don&#8217;t even look what the magazines and advertisments make them to be.</p>
<p>picaso, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zairi Zaidi</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/so-we-went-ahead-and-pieced-together-a-new-girl/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Zairi Zaidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about-face.org/blog/?p=355#comment-447</guid>
		<description>Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danielle</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/so-we-went-ahead-and-pieced-together-a-new-girl/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about-face.org/blog/?p=355#comment-446</guid>
		<description>I just say stop retouching all together. Let magazines and websites show &quot;natural&quot; beauty--the real person--and not the false recreated image.
I mean, even models aren&#039;t &quot;perfect&quot; enough and need retouching. It&#039;s insanity!

I don&#039;t think disclosing such information (amount of retouching) will do much. A lot of people I know never even read the print--they just look at those pictures. And, even if they did read about how much each image was altered, it still won&#039;t do a lot.
Pictures are still going to be more powerful. They&#039;re still going to stick in your mind--more so than those words on that page.
People are still going to compare themselves, even if they are informed about all the retouching. They&#039;re still going to yearn to be that &#039;perfect&#039;, strive for it. Words on a page won&#039;t change it.

We need to stop retouching images and let everyone see the unaltered, entirely natural humans instead of the unattainable, fake beauties that bombard us on a day-to-day, hour-to-hour, minute-to-minute basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just say stop retouching all together. Let magazines and websites show &#8220;natural&#8221; beauty&#8211;the real person&#8211;and not the false recreated image.<br />
I mean, even models aren&#8217;t &#8220;perfect&#8221; enough and need retouching. It&#8217;s insanity!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think disclosing such information (amount of retouching) will do much. A lot of people I know never even read the print&#8211;they just look at those pictures. And, even if they did read about how much each image was altered, it still won&#8217;t do a lot.<br />
Pictures are still going to be more powerful. They&#8217;re still going to stick in your mind&#8211;more so than those words on that page.<br />
People are still going to compare themselves, even if they are informed about all the retouching. They&#8217;re still going to yearn to be that &#8216;perfect&#8217;, strive for it. Words on a page won&#8217;t change it.</p>
<p>We need to stop retouching images and let everyone see the unaltered, entirely natural humans instead of the unattainable, fake beauties that bombard us on a day-to-day, hour-to-hour, minute-to-minute basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
