<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skechers wants girls to &#8220;Shape-up&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.about-face.org/skechers-wants-girls-to-shape-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.about-face.org/skechers-wants-girls-to-shape-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ATB</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/skechers-wants-girls-to-shape-up/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>ATB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 01:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about-face.org/blog/?p=5036#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>Wow, I watched the advertisment...really weird to think that this stuff is out there (TV is evil). Another example of companies playing on people&#039;s insecurities to sell products (it obviously works). If I had a daughter in that age group I&#039;d be pissed off. Good job calling Sketchers out on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I watched the advertisment&#8230;really weird to think that this stuff is out there (TV is evil). Another example of companies playing on people&#8217;s insecurities to sell products (it obviously works). If I had a daughter in that age group I&#8217;d be pissed off. Good job calling Sketchers out on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tea</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/skechers-wants-girls-to-shape-up/#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>Tea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about-face.org/blog/?p=5036#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>Wow, your last email especially is great. I think shape ups are fine, but the way they&#039;re marketed and the fact that there isn&#039;t a boys&#039; line is troublesome. 

Also, &quot;looking good&quot; shouldn&#039;t be a line at all or a selling point at all. Children should learn to associate exercise with feeling good and being healthyâ€”not a means to look a certain way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, your last email especially is great. I think shape ups are fine, but the way they&#8217;re marketed and the fact that there isn&#8217;t a boys&#8217; line is troublesome. </p>
<p>Also, &#8220;looking good&#8221; shouldn&#8217;t be a line at all or a selling point at all. Children should learn to associate exercise with feeling good and being healthyâ€”not a means to look a certain way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/skechers-wants-girls-to-shape-up/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 20:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about-face.org/blog/?p=5036#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>one angry girl - your emails to Skechers were brilliant.  The sexualisation of childhood is a big problem, and is advancing fast without anyone noticing.  Don&#039;t even get me started on Bratz dolls...

Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one angry girl &#8211; your emails to Skechers were brilliant.  The sexualisation of childhood is a big problem, and is advancing fast without anyone noticing.  Don&#8217;t even get me started on Bratz dolls&#8230;</p>
<p>Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: one angry girl</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/skechers-wants-girls-to-shape-up/#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>one angry girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about-face.org/blog/?p=5036#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>I wrote to Skechers:

I&#039;m a mother of two young children and I have bought at least one pair of Skechers for my son. Now that I have seen ads for your &quot;shape ups for girls,&quot; I will never buy your products again. It&#039;s Payless from now on, suckers.

 

They wrote:

The whole message behind Shape-ups is to get people moving, exercising, and getting fit. Skechers&#039; advertising for Shape-ups for Girls contains the same message as the First Lady&#039;s Let&#039;s Move initiative, which is aimed specifically at children. American children are more sedentary now than at any time in our history. Shape-ups are intended to get people moving and being fit. We think that is a good thing for adults and kids -- and hope others understand the intent. 

Thank you,  

Brooks  

 

Then I wrote:

Thanks for responding, but you don&#039;t explain why the shoes are targeted at girls and not all children.  Aren&#039;t boys sedentary and fat too?  You know I&#039;m not the first person to complain about this, you have already gotten 9000 emails from Change.org.

 

Then they wrote:

The reason we do not have a Shape-Ups line at this time for boys is simply a matter of how our company&#039;s research and development works for Shape-ups. The Shape-ups line was first created for women and, once it became clear they were popular and there was a demand, the line for men was developed and marketed. The same is true for the kids&#039; lines. Shape-Ups for Girls were rolled out first. The success of this line and the need in the market will guide us in deciding if we will create a line for boys. Other lines may start with Men&#039;s. 

Thank you, 

Brooks

 

Then I wrote:

Brooks,

I know that you are just doing your job, which is to debate with irate customers in a polite manner while keeping to the party line as determined by your corporate masters.  I know there are probably other jobs you&#039;d rather have, but this one will pay the rent for now.  But I need to tell you that you and your company are part of a much larger campaign to sexualize childhood, and thus eliminate it entirely.  I know that wasn&#039;t in your original job description, but nonetheless you are a small piece of the machine working towards the day when 6-year-old girls exercise compulsively because their butts aren&#039;t the right shape.  I am a small piece of the opposition fighting you.  So maybe it&#039;s time to switch sides.

Regards, Me

 

I didn&#039;t hear back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote to Skechers:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a mother of two young children and I have bought at least one pair of Skechers for my son. Now that I have seen ads for your &#8220;shape ups for girls,&#8221; I will never buy your products again. It&#8217;s Payless from now on, suckers.</p>
<p>They wrote:</p>
<p>The whole message behind Shape-ups is to get people moving, exercising, and getting fit. Skechers&#8217; advertising for Shape-ups for Girls contains the same message as the First Lady&#8217;s Let&#8217;s Move initiative, which is aimed specifically at children. American children are more sedentary now than at any time in our history. Shape-ups are intended to get people moving and being fit. We think that is a good thing for adults and kids &#8212; and hope others understand the intent. </p>
<p>Thank you,  </p>
<p>Brooks  </p>
<p>Then I wrote:</p>
<p>Thanks for responding, but you don&#8217;t explain why the shoes are targeted at girls and not all children.  Aren&#8217;t boys sedentary and fat too?  You know I&#8217;m not the first person to complain about this, you have already gotten 9000 emails from Change.org.</p>
<p>Then they wrote:</p>
<p>The reason we do not have a Shape-Ups line at this time for boys is simply a matter of how our company&#8217;s research and development works for Shape-ups. The Shape-ups line was first created for women and, once it became clear they were popular and there was a demand, the line for men was developed and marketed. The same is true for the kids&#8217; lines. Shape-Ups for Girls were rolled out first. The success of this line and the need in the market will guide us in deciding if we will create a line for boys. Other lines may start with Men&#8217;s. </p>
<p>Thank you, </p>
<p>Brooks</p>
<p>Then I wrote:</p>
<p>Brooks,</p>
<p>I know that you are just doing your job, which is to debate with irate customers in a polite manner while keeping to the party line as determined by your corporate masters.  I know there are probably other jobs you&#8217;d rather have, but this one will pay the rent for now.  But I need to tell you that you and your company are part of a much larger campaign to sexualize childhood, and thus eliminate it entirely.  I know that wasn&#8217;t in your original job description, but nonetheless you are a small piece of the machine working towards the day when 6-year-old girls exercise compulsively because their butts aren&#8217;t the right shape.  I am a small piece of the opposition fighting you.  So maybe it&#8217;s time to switch sides.</p>
<p>Regards, Me</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t hear back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/skechers-wants-girls-to-shape-up/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://about-face.org/blog/?p=5036#comment-1628</guid>
		<description>Your metaphor about breast implants and breast self-exams is really good. This is shameful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your metaphor about breast implants and breast self-exams is really good. This is shameful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.406 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-06 15:05:00 -->