aboutface-mobile-menu-hide_03
aboutface-mobile-menu-show_03
facebook twitter youtube tumblr share this

Misogynist musing of the month: Hottest political women of 2012

Date: July 10, 2012 | Posted By: Stacey

Get ready to be pissed off. I mean really pissed off.

The Washington Times’ Communities section online featured an article by independent, conservative writer Eric Golub titled, “The Top 30 Hottest Political Women of 2012”, a wretched little roster objectifying accomplished women in the name of the “ultimate aphrodisiac” — power.

Are female politicians judged on their appearance? In the words of Sarah Palin: "You betcha!"

Think that sounds jaw-droppingly sexist and offensive? It is. Golub uses “political” as a broad term, relating it to any women operating in the sphere of politics, from commentators to legislators, but all that are judged on the merits of their magnetism. Fear not, he does not discriminate based on age, because “hot is hot.” Golub unabashedly lists ten liberals, centrists, and conservatives and makes a point to omit Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin from the list in a benevolent gesture that would “give another deserving hottie a chance.”

His list provides a short narrative of each lucky lady, giving a nod to her political accomplishments or sprinkling a noteworthy factoid, but in every instance, disarming her with a reference to her appearance.

Fox News Legal Bombshells highlight Kimberly Guilfoyle who “bounces in her chair to the music, which she knows drives the male audience insane.” Why of course, Mr. Golub, because the motive of all women everywhere is to satisfy the viewing pleasure of her male spectators. Pam Bondi, the Florida Attorney General is a “tough as nails prosecutor who simply looks stunning”. Lauded for leadership, Lisa Roper’s main purpose is serving as proof that the National Federation of Republican Women is “getting younger and hotter.”

Let’s not forget Leslie Marshall, a liberal radio host who is a “fierce debater” with skills “matched only by her pleasant nature and warm smile.” Ah, yes, because all women in power are made palatable by a disarming softness and feminine affability.

These are only a few of the repugnant remarks that left me roiling. What’s worse is that this is only an abridged version of a larger crass collection of his “120 political bouncies” of 2012. He harrowingly describes this compilation as “20 breasts and 20 hides per all three political denominations.”

My favorite quote in the piece gives lip service to Jill Filipovic of Feministe and Jessica Valenti who founded Feministing, both whom I greatly admire, by channeling a tired and clichéd anti-feminist mantra, “Not all feminists are hideously ugly.“ Golub reduces women of great accomplishments and potent power to compromised consumables. This list is a disservice to politics and horrifyingly degrading to women everywhere.

Hillary Rodham Clinton made headlines for daring to go out in public sans makeup during a trip to Bangledesh this past May.

Women are already patently underrepresented at all levels of government, occupying only 17% of the seats in Congress, 23% of statewide elective office positions and 24% of State Legislatures. The United States ranks 90 in the world in terms of women in governmental positions of power and only 6 of our 50 states have female governors.

Aside from these harrowing statistics, female politicians are famously scrutinized for their appearance and fashion choices in a way that male politicos are not. A 2008 study from Northwestern University known as ‘The Political Gender Gap’ revealed that facial attractiveness was more important for the electoral success of female politicians. The same was not true for their male counterparts. In other words not only do you have to be a competent candidate, but you also must be visually pleasing to win votes.

How can be we fight for representative equality when we’re constantly being impaired by the politics of beauty?

Golub commits an egregious crime with his misogynistic and pompous pontification. He is encouraging others to openly objectify women in power. He gives lip service to their merits, but only at the price of reducing them to eye candy. He sanctions sexism by celebrating female power as long as it is accompanied by conventional attractiveness. What better way to disempower them than by reducing them to numbers on a list?

I tweeted Golub based on his information listed on the website and called him out on his overt objectification. I have yet to hear a peep from him, but I’m sure he’d welcome additional critiquing of his offensive ode to female political power. Tell Golub how you feel by tweeting him @TYGRRRREXPRESS or sending him a message here.

-Heather




What Do You Think?

6 Responses to Misogynist musing of the month: Hottest political women of 2012

  1. Hailey on 07-12-2012

    I can't believe how disgusting Golub's piece is! Just left a lengthy comment for him to enjoy.
  2. Alex on 07-12-2012

    He should at least be obligated to match it with a "Hottest Political Men of 2012". Oh wait, no one would ever bother writing such an inane list
  3. Brighid on 07-13-2012

    Lame much?
  4. Mike Reilly on 07-13-2012

    Incredible! I can only type with three fingers from each hand. For him to be able to type his column with just one hand while the other hand - covered with Vaseline - is busy looking at "hottie" photos is amazing.
  5. Heather on 07-13-2012

    Good stuff guys!! @ Hailey - way to go! I tweeted him when I first came across this atrocious article, but nada. Alex – not likely at all. Brighid - Super lame! Mike - the foul fodder on his blog makes the TWT version smell like roses.
  6. Clearly Anonymous on 07-29-2012

    I think you might be stretching a little far to call a "hottest X of year Y" list misogynist. There are plenty of these lists of all stripes for men, women, transgender or whoever. It's just a recognition that people find other people attractive and want to comment on that attractiveness.

    Top 10: Hottest male politicians