<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kia chalks up another ad as a sexist fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.about-face.org/kia-chalks-up-another-ad-as-a-sexist-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.about-face.org/kia-chalks-up-another-ad-as-a-sexist-fail/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/kia-chalks-up-another-ad-as-a-sexist-fail/#comment-163254</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 01:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.about-face.org/?p=14307#comment-163254</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your thoughts, Christopher!

You&#039;re right, it could be a cultural thing. However, this was an ad that aired in the US, and Kia have had very different ads in different markets (see the Australian ad referenced in the article). It would seem quite weird if they weren&#039;t aware of their market?

Always possible, I suppose!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your thoughts, Christopher!</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, it could be a cultural thing. However, this was an ad that aired in the US, and Kia have had very different ads in different markets (see the Australian ad referenced in the article). It would seem quite weird if they weren&#8217;t aware of their market?</p>
<p>Always possible, I suppose!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/kia-chalks-up-another-ad-as-a-sexist-fail/#comment-163078</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 02:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.about-face.org/?p=14307#comment-163078</guid>
		<description>Yep, was quite surprised when I saw this. I wasn&#039;t sure how to feel about the guy getting beat up in the first one as I didn&#039;t find it all that funny, but understood that it was tongue-in-cheek cartoon-like violence (as the guy obviously was fine from a throw that should have killed him), and it at least fit their &quot;respect the tech&quot; slogan.

But I was really surprised to seem them endorsing the idea of taking home a sexbot with your new car. The protecting-it-from-birds joke is a weak link to their slogan and the idea of a compliant fembot to take home is a bit of a bizarre association to make with your automobile product.

But I wonder if this is a cultural thing? Koreans are much more familiar with robots as cultural proxies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, was quite surprised when I saw this. I wasn&#8217;t sure how to feel about the guy getting beat up in the first one as I didn&#8217;t find it all that funny, but understood that it was tongue-in-cheek cartoon-like violence (as the guy obviously was fine from a throw that should have killed him), and it at least fit their &#8220;respect the tech&#8221; slogan.</p>
<p>But I was really surprised to seem them endorsing the idea of taking home a sexbot with your new car. The protecting-it-from-birds joke is a weak link to their slogan and the idea of a compliant fembot to take home is a bit of a bizarre association to make with your automobile product.</p>
<p>But I wonder if this is a cultural thing? Koreans are much more familiar with robots as cultural proxies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/kia-chalks-up-another-ad-as-a-sexist-fail/#comment-163031</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 18:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.about-face.org/?p=14307#comment-163031</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick, thanks for your concern. I believe it is possible to care about many things at once. However, this is a blog about the media and body image, so I feel that the topic is appropriate here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick, thanks for your concern. I believe it is possible to care about many things at once. However, this is a blog about the media and body image, so I feel that the topic is appropriate here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/kia-chalks-up-another-ad-as-a-sexist-fail/#comment-162930</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 00:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.about-face.org/?p=14307#comment-162930</guid>
		<description>With the GOP slashing billions of dollars from programs  people need to live, THIS is what bothers you? A car ad with a robot woman?  Corporate America says thanks for playing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the GOP slashing billions of dollars from programs  people need to live, THIS is what bothers you? A car ad with a robot woman?  Corporate America says thanks for playing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/kia-chalks-up-another-ad-as-a-sexist-fail/#comment-162570</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 17:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.about-face.org/?p=14307#comment-162570</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, they are both unacceptably sexist. But this article just deals with the newer one. I would love to read your commentary on the older ad as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, they are both unacceptably sexist. But this article just deals with the newer one. I would love to read your commentary on the older ad as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C@~</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/kia-chalks-up-another-ad-as-a-sexist-fail/#comment-162554</link>
		<dc:creator>C@~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 16:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.about-face.org/?p=14307#comment-162554</guid>
		<description>Yup, all that matters is that the robot-woman is wearing too little clothing. But it&#039;s totally okay for her/it to beat up a man. 

Both images are equally sexist but you seem to brush over that with your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, all that matters is that the robot-woman is wearing too little clothing. But it&#8217;s totally okay for her/it to beat up a man. </p>
<p>Both images are equally sexist but you seem to brush over that with your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/kia-chalks-up-another-ad-as-a-sexist-fail/#comment-161783</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 00:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.about-face.org/?p=14307#comment-161783</guid>
		<description>Exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silfren</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/kia-chalks-up-another-ad-as-a-sexist-fail/#comment-161728</link>
		<dc:creator>Silfren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 19:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.about-face.org/?p=14307#comment-161728</guid>
		<description>The ad message IS sending a sexist message.  It&#039;s not just about the car.  Do you even know how commercials work?  If Kia didn&#039;t want to convey a particular message with the robot woman and her nerd man, it would have used a different image entirely.  

The first time I saw this commercial, my impression was that the purpose of this guy having a robot girlfriend is that robots don&#039;t ask questions, they simply do as programmed, and she is clearly programmed to be both his personal servant and sex toy.  Of COURSE it is a sexist message.  I rage every time I see the damn thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ad message IS sending a sexist message.  It&#8217;s not just about the car.  Do you even know how commercials work?  If Kia didn&#8217;t want to convey a particular message with the robot woman and her nerd man, it would have used a different image entirely.  </p>
<p>The first time I saw this commercial, my impression was that the purpose of this guy having a robot girlfriend is that robots don&#8217;t ask questions, they simply do as programmed, and she is clearly programmed to be both his personal servant and sex toy.  Of COURSE it is a sexist message.  I rage every time I see the damn thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/kia-chalks-up-another-ad-as-a-sexist-fail/#comment-161689</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 17:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.about-face.org/?p=14307#comment-161689</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment. Indeed a tradition - but that doesn&#039;t make it OK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment. Indeed a tradition &#8211; but that doesn&#8217;t make it OK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa</title>
		<link>http://www.about-face.org/kia-chalks-up-another-ad-as-a-sexist-fail/#comment-161687</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 17:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.about-face.org/?p=14307#comment-161687</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your thoughts, Paul. So you think they only way the car could be protected from said &quot;guano&quot; is for a sexy robotic lady to move the pole? Surely therein lies the sexism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your thoughts, Paul. So you think they only way the car could be protected from said &#8220;guano&#8221; is for a sexy robotic lady to move the pole? Surely therein lies the sexism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.300 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-06 12:37:14 -->