');
Logo
Shopping Cart
Donate Now

PETA

Time for PETA to change their campaign strategy

The male oppressor with the vulnerable and scared female.

If it looks like violence against women and it smells like violence against women, is it violence against women? Nope. It could be the anti-animal testing campaign Fighting Animal Cruelty by cosmetics company Lush and About-Face frequent offender PETA. The new campaign by the two companies has become a worldwide phenomenon in a matter of weeks by having a performance artist sit in a Lush store window and undergo cosmetics testing by a male doctor.

PETA’s campaigns are famous for being shockingly sexist by openly comparing women (not all people — women) to animals. At this point, it’s not ignorance that PETA can fall back on: “I didn’t know that putting Pamela Anderson in a bikini on a billboard and comparing her to a cow was objectifying women” doesn’t work as an excuse anymore.

The Lush campaign manager, Tamsin Osmond, has stated in a recent post:

I am very aware and very sad that campaigning groups have capitalized on titillating images of women…on images and storylines that encourage the abuse of women… We felt it was important, strong, well and thoroughly considered that the test subject was a woman… the oppressor was male and the abused was vulnerable and scared. Continue reading

PETA strikes again in San Francisco: Women stand in as literal pieces of meat

Women in the media are relentlessly treated like nothing more than pieces of meat, presented as objects for the mindless consumption of the viewers, and for the financial gain of the industries behind sexist marketing tactics. Who would have expected that an organization could take the “women treated as pieces of meat” route so literally? Are we even surprised that it’s PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals)?

PETA uses women as pieces of meat in protest today in San Francisco.

Today in San Francisco, one of our workshop leaders, Ivette, was walking back to work from her lunch hour, and stumbled upon a horrific scene. Naked women (who were “attractive,” white, thin, and with large breasts, as usual for PETA) were sprawled out on the sidewalk in human-sized meat packaging trays, wrapped in cellophane, and covered in fake blood. (There were no men in similar poses.) Slogans such as “Meat Is Murder” appeared on signs, while other PETA members handed out pamphlets.

As atrocious and sexist as this scene is, this is nothing new for PETA. They continually sexualize women to promote their message, even if it sends out harmful sexist messages about women.

As a vegan, I can truly get behind PETA’s goals and messages; as a feminist, I cannot get behind their appalling tactics. I understand the importance of spreading knowledge about animal rights, but we cannot do so at the expense of human rights.

Continue reading

PETA – People for the Egregious Treatment of Adult (Women)

Is this appropriate incentive to go vegetarian?

You’d think an organization like PETA — People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals — would be a proactive organization, readily supporting healthy, happy agendas to get people living healthier lifestyles. Right?

Wrong. PETA is one of the worst culprits of objectification and sexualization of women. Somehow, PETA tries to equate pornographic images of half-naked women with the incentive to go vegetarian or vegan.

The “ethical treatment of animals” motive gets lost in translation somewhere between women sucking on veggies in the hot tub and blatant implications of sex-based violence.

Allow me to explain.

Continue reading

Banned Super Bowl ad takes PETA from controversial to pornographic

PETA continues to have nothing to do with the ethical treatment of animals.

PETA continues to have nothing to do with the ethical treatment of animals.

PETA, I just…I can’t.

Ladies and gentlemen, you are about to witness what happens when an ad campaign goes from controversial (yet debatably tasteful) exhibitionism to straight-up, soft-core pornography.

A word to the wise: do not view this video at work, around small children, or in the presence of anyone with an ounce of respect for women (or respect for vegetables — that poor produce gets absolutely manhandled). Continue reading

PETA pushes shock value. Again.

Stripped down, decapitated female bodies are somehow relevant to the ethical treatment of animals. Really.

Stripped down, decapitated female bodies are somehow relevant to the ethical treatment of animals. Really.

Newsflash PETA: Nudity and shock value are only novel for so long.

I guess I can give PETA points for creativity and timeliness, but how many points do I subtract for consistent sexism, misogyny and, um…hardly ever depicting a single animal?

The latest controversy-causing PETA ads poke fun at the body scan machines used at airport security checkpoints, and feature a half-naked woman (naturally).

The message, “Be Proud of Your Body Scan: Go Vegan” is displayed across her bra and underwear.

Classy as always, PETA.

Okay, the ads are attention-grabbing. They’re unexpected. They’re “cutting edge” (can’t you just see a roomful of ad execs excitedly throwing that term around?). Continue reading

Gallery of Offenders: Treating animals ethically, but what about women?

Questions to Consider:

Source: PETA website

 

* What is this ad trying to convey?

* Who is this ad’s intended audience?

* What does a woman’s body have to do with the ethical treatment of animals?

What We Think:

They may be called People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, but it’s hard to remember the last time PETA’s ads showed any creature that wasn’t baring decidedly human, female assets.

PETA’s latest shock tactic showcases Pamela Anderson marked up like a butcher’s diagram, helpfully indicating where to find her “breast,” “rump,” “round,” and more. According to PETA’s web site, the tagline “All Animals Have the Same Parts” suggests that “just like humans, animals are made of flesh, blood, and bone and have organs and senses.”

Call us crazy, but seeing a bikini-clad Pam divided up and defined by her body parts makes us think sexism, not empathy for animals.

Officials in Canada seemed to agree, because they banned the ad, saying, “it goes against all principles public organizations are fighting for in the everlasting battle of equality between men and women.” We couldn’t have said it better ourselves.

And P.S. PETA, don’t think we’re letting you off the hook for last year’s grossly offensive “Save the Whales” campaign, either. (by Michelle Konstantinovsky)

Take Action! Contact:

PETA

501 Front St.

Norfolk, VA 23510

(757) 622-PETA

email: info@peta.org

web comment form: peta.org/about/c-email_peta.asp

Learn how to write a great complaint letter here.

Blog archive

categories